Thursday, December 20, 2007

Democrats - "Where's The Beef?"

It has become pathetically apparent that the Democratic Party - a once great party - is a mere shadow of its former self. It is now a party without substance, leadership, direction or talent. The political Party that produced Jefferson, Cleveland, Truman and JFK, has in recent years, since the 60's, degraded itself to the point where the leadership offered up as their best talent consists of Nancy Pelosi as House leader, Harry Reid as Senate majority leader, and wannabe presidents, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards. Then throw in the other Democrat heavyweights (no pun intended) like Ted Kennedy, John Murtha, Dick Durbin, Barney Frank, etc, and you see a coalition of sub-standard bureaucrats with an agenda that is beholden to special interest groups who basically are aligned with Soviet style communism. Their agenda seeks to offer government solutions to individual problems. Unfortunately, they never tell you that to do this, individual freedoms are sacrificed on the alter of false equity. They govern on the principals of over taxation, regulation and an ideology that crushes economic opportunity, advancement and reward while claiming to be a friend to the meek and powerless. This of course is the big lie that they've been able to project with the willing assistance of their volunteer PR firm, The Mainstream media consisting of 95% of Hollywood, most of television and the vast majority of printed journalism. Add into this propaganda campaign team the all out leftist ideological indoctrination inflicted on college students by the out of touch pseudo-intellectuals that dominate educational faculties throughout the country and its a wonder that we still exist as a nation at all.

Again, just look at the embarrassing crop of presidential candidates offered up by the Democrats since Johnson. Carter and Clinton were able to win because of incredible bungling by conservatives; namely, The Nixon scandals that continued to scar the Ford administration and Ross Perrot who split the conservative vote allowing Clinton to win by default. Other than those 2 recent fluke wins, The Dems have nothing to offer this country in the area of leadership.

Worst of all, this next year, they will offer voters one candidate from the absolute worst crop of potential presidential candidates that this country has ever seen. In an effort to bolster the electability of the 2 leading candidates, Clinton and Obama, strategists have effectively cloned both candidates with popular cultural icons in an attempt to make both the frontrunners more electable to the ignorant, unwashed masses. Obama has been joined at the hip by TV heavyweight, Oprah Winfree. Naturally, the candidate’s new name should be Obamprah. Obampra's primary rival Hillary Clinton is being rescued by her on paper husband and former impeached president, Bill Clinton. It follows therefore that Hillary's new name should be Hillbilly. After all, In 1992 Hillary proudly claimed that the Clinton presidency would be a "co-presidency", a 2 for 1. Both Democratic frontrunners are embarrassing in that neither has the experience or skills appropriate to be leader of the free world. Hillbilly has been a one and a half term senator where she sandbagged her New York election riding the coat tails of her husband who humiliated her in front of the world. But I guess when your entire life is dominated by the desire to attain and retain power, who cares what you have to do to get it. Obama on the other hand is a real featherweight and devastatingly unprepared for a global stage. He basically ran for the senate unopposed and has been there for 2 years - not enough time to develop the type of leadership necessary to lead 300 million people in a dangerous world. His ideas on foreign policy are scary and immature and naturally, his far left ideology demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of free market economies. Then close behind these two giants is the ambulance chasing metro sexual, John Edwards who is trying to buy the presidency with the hundreds of millions of dollars collected by suing corporations for the suffering of innocent accident and illness victims. Like a typical Democrat, Edwards cried to the jury that he was just looking out for the little guy, when actually he was the big winner in the litigation lottery.

So ultimately, with the horrible crop of candidates that the Dems have to choose from, the only true question to be asked is, Who will they choose to lose to whatever Republican they run against? It truly will be the Republican's race to lose. Both Hillbilly and Obamprah are so weak as candidates that it would take a complete collapse on the part of Republicans for them to win. And that will not happen. No matter what propping up is done by the MSM, how many favorable stories and endorsements by fruitcake celebrities, I trust the judgment of real Americans to see through the BS and choose the responsible adult to lead us in 2008. That leader will not be a Democrat!

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Terrorist's rights!

Oh my. The injustice of it all. News flash: Al Qaeda operative Abu Zubayda was waterboarded by the CIA. Watch out, here come the legions of screaming liberals. How dare any U.S government agency resort to these methods in order to extract information from those that will stop at nothing to destroy us. Despite the invaluable information obtained from this cockroach that directly saved lives, liberals everywhere begin to hyperventilate any time they perceive that the inalienable rights of these goat-humping, child-molesting, women-mutilating, murderous, 6th-century, islamic psychopaths are violated.

What is it with liberals? They celebrate 1.5 million murdered children in America annually under the guise of reproductive rights but, apply a little pain to the most inhuman monsters on earth and you'd think Bush was being elected for a third term. It's insane. If the military, CIA, FBI, whomever, has to pull out a few fingernails to keep us from enduring another 9/11, so be it. It's reminiscent of Abu Ghraib, liberals still believe we should be housing captured terrorists at the Waldorf Astoria, including marble foot baths and all the muslim treats we can shove down their bearded, unkempt faces.

Maybe we should put one liberal with each terrorist captured, housed together in the same cell. That way, liberals could monitor the treatment of their precious muslim friends and, at the same time, we'd be dealing out the worst torture ever devised: enduring endless hours in a closed space with a rabid liberal. Nothing could be more horrific than that. Said terrorists would spill their collective guts in no time.

Friday, December 07, 2007

islam's Top Ten

As liberals fight any attempt at profiling middle eastern men, applauding the installation of foot baths at U.S airports for muslims (at U.S. taxpayers expense), and ceaselessly work for the removal of the Ten Commandments in any public building along with any reference to the Holy Bible or Jesus Christ in American society, here’s a top ten list describing the wonderful attributes of islam, the religion of peace.

#1 10,000 deadly terror attacks committed explicitly in the name of islam in just the last six years. (Other religions combined for perhaps a dozen or so).

#2 Muhammad, the prophet of islam, had people killed for insulting him or criticizing his religion. This included women. Muslims are told to emulate the example of Muhammad.

#3 Muhammad said in many places that he has been "ordered by Allah to fight men until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger." In the last nine years of his life, he ordered no less than 65 military campaigns to do exactly that.
Muhammad inspired his men to war with the basest of motives, using captured loot, sex and a gluttonous paradise as incentives. He beheaded captives, enslaved children and raped women captured in battle. Again, Muslims are told to emulate the example of Muhammad.

#4 After Muhammad died, the people who lived with him, and knew his religion best, immediately fell into war with each other.
Muhammad's favorite daughter, Fatima, and her husband, Ali (the second convert to islam, who was raised like a son to Muhammad) fought a war against an army raised by Aisha, Muhammad's favorite wife - and one whom he had said was the "perfect woman."
Not only was her husband, Ali, eventually murdered, but Fatima (who survived the early years at Mecca safe and sound) died of stress from the persecution of fellow Muslims only three months after her father died.
Three of the first four Muslim rulers (caliphs) were murdered. All of them were among Muhammad's closest companions. The third caliph was killed by the son of the first. The fourth caliph was killed by the fifth, who subsequently poisoned one of Muhammad's two favorite grandsons. Muhammad's other grandson was later beheaded by the sixth caliph.
Within 50 years, the Kaaba, which had stood for centuries under pagan religion, lay in ruins from internal Muslim war.

#5 Muhammad directed Muslims to wage war on other religions and bring them under submission to islam. Within the first few decades following his death, his Arabian companions invaded and conquered Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist and Zoroastrian lands.

#6 Muslims continued their Jihad against other religions for 1400 years, checked only by the ability of non-Muslims to defend themselves. To this day, not a week goes by that islamic fundamentalists do not attempt to kill Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists explicitly in the name of Allah.
None of these other religions are at war with each other.

#7 islam is the only religion that has to retain its membership by threatening to kill anyone who leaves. This is according to the example set by Muhammad.

#8 islam teaches that non-Muslims are less than fully human. Muhammad said that Muslims can be put to death for murder, but that a Muslim could never be put to death for killing a non-Muslim.

#9 The Qur'an never once speaks of Allah's love for non-Muslims, but it speaks of Allah's cruelty toward and hatred of non-Muslims more than 500 times.

#10 "Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar!"
(The last words from the cockpit of Flight 93) Home Page

Monday, December 03, 2007

islam: the religion of peace

Here's an excellent speech delivered by Geert Wilders to the Dutch Parliament earlier this Fall. This guy gets it, unlike so many political and liberal idiots in this country who bend over backwards to cater to islam. Islam is a 6th century death cult that is completely incompatible with Western Civilization, values, and beliefs. When Nancy Pelosi swore in MN Congressman Keith Ellison on a qur'an versus a Bible the resultant uproar by Americans was met with a flood of screaming from liberals, who think it's perfectly acceptable to recognize this Murder Manual as the wonderful document that it is. No matter that our enemies stand on it and use it to justify killing us infidels. Read on.

Madam Speaker, allow me, first, to express my sincere thanks to you personally for having planned a debate on Islam on the very day of my birthday. I could not have wished for a nicer present!
Madam Speaker, approximately 1400 years ago war was declared on us by an ideology of hate and violence which arose at the time and was proclaimed by a barbarian who called himself the Prophet Mohammed. I am referring to Islam.

Madam Speaker, let me start with the foundation of the Islamic faith, the Koran. The Koran’s core theme is about the duty of all Muslims to fight non-Muslims; an Islamic Mein Kampf, in which fight means war, jihad. The Koran is above all a book of war – a call to butcher non-Muslims (2:191, 3:141, 4:91, 5:3), to roast them (4:56, 69:30-69:32), and to cause bloodbaths amongst them (47:4). Jews are compared to monkeys and pigs (2:65, 5:60, 7:166), while people who believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God must according to the Koran be fought (9:30).

Madam Speaker, the West has no problems with Jews or Christians, but it does have problems with Islam. It is still possible, even today, for Muslims to view the Koran, which they regard as valid for all time, as a license to kill. And that is exactly what happens. The Koran is worded in such a way that its instructions are addressed to Muslims for eternity, which includes today’s Muslims. This in contrast to texts in the Bible, which is formulated as a number of historical narratives, placing events in a distant past. Let us remind ourselves that it was Muslims, not Jews or Christians, who committed the catastrophic terrorist attacks in New York, Madrid and London; and that it was no coincidence that Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered by a Muslim, Mohammed Bouyeri.

Madam Speaker, I acknowledge that there are people who call themselves Muslims and who respect our laws. My party, the Freedom Party, has nothing against such people, of course. However, the Koran does have something against them. For it is stated in the Koran in Sura 2, verse 85, that those believers who do not believe in everything the Koran states will be humiliated and receive the severest punishment; which means that they will roast in Hell. In other words, people who call themselves Muslims but who do not believe, for example, in Sura 9, verse 30, which states that Jews and Christians must be fought, or, for example, in Sura 5, verse 38, which states that the hand of a thief must be cut off, such people will be humiliated and roast in Hell. Note that it is not me who is making this up. All this can be found in the Koran. The Koran also states that Muslims who believe in only part of the Koran are in fact apostates, and we know what has to happen to apostates. They have to be killed.

Madam Speaker, the Koran is a book that incites to violence. I remind the House that the distribution of such texts is unlawful according to Article 132 of our Penal Code. In addition, the Koran incites to hatred and calls for murder and mayhem. The distribution of such texts is made punishable by Article 137(e). The Koran is therefore a highly dangerous book; a book which is completely against our legal order and our democratic institutions. In this light, it is an absolute necessity that the Koran be banned for the defence and reinforcement of our civilisation and our constitutional state. I shall propose a second-reading motion to that effect.

Madam Speaker, there is no such thing as “moderate Islam”. As Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said the other day, and I quote, “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it”. Islam is in pursuit of dominance. It wishes to exact its imperialist agenda by force on a worldwide scale (8:39). This is clear from European history. Fortunately, the first Islamic invasion of Europe was stopped at Poitiers in 732; the second in Vienna in 1683. Madam Speaker, let us ensure that the third Islamic invasion, which is currently in full spate, will be stopped too in spite of its insidious nature and notwithstanding the fact that, in contrast to the 8th and 17th centuries, it has no need for an Islamic army because the scared “dhimmis” in the West, also those in Dutch politics, have left their doors wide open to Islam and Muslims.
Apart from conquest, Madam Speaker, Islam is also bent on installing a totally different form of law and order, namely Sharia law. This makes Islam, apart from a religion for hundreds of millions of Muslims also, and in particular, a political ideology (with political/constitutional/Islamic basic values, etc). Islam is an ideology without any respect for others; not for Christians, not for Jews, not for non believers and not for apostates. Islam aims to dominate, subject, kill and wage war.

Madam Speaker, the Islamic incursion must be stopped. Islam is the Trojan Horse in Europe. If we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia and Netherabia will just be a matter of time. One century ago, there were approximately 50 Muslims in the Netherlands. Today, there are about 1 million Muslims in this country. Where will it end? We are heading for the end of European and Dutch civilisation as we know it. Where is our Prime Minister in all this? In reply to my questions in the House he said, without batting an eyelid, that there is no question of our country being Islamified. Now, this reply constituted a historical error as soon as it was uttered. Very many Dutch citizens, Madam Speaker, experience the presence of Islam around them. And I can report that they have had enough of burkas, headscarves, the ritual slaughter of animals, so called honour revenge, blaring minarets, female circumcision, hymen restoration operations, abuse of homosexuals, Turkish and Arabic on the buses and trains as well as on town hall leaflets, halal meat at grocery shops and department stores, Sharia exams, the Finance Minister’s Sharia mortgages, and the enormous overrepresentation of Muslims in the area of crime, including Moroccan street terrorists.
In spite of all this, Madam Speaker, there is hope. Fortunately. The majority of Dutch citizens have become fully aware of the danger, and regard Islam as a threat to our culture. My party, the Freedom Party, takes those citizens seriously and comes to their defense.
Many Dutch citizens are fed up to the back teeth and yearn for action. However, their representatives in The Hague are doing precisely nothing. They are held back by fear, political correctness or simply electoral motives. This is particularly clear in the case of PvdA, the Dutch Labour Party, which is afraid of losing Muslim voters. The Prime Minister said in Indonesia the other day that Islam does not pose any danger. Minister Donner believes that Sharia law should be capable of being introduced in the Netherlands if the majority want it. Minister Vogelaar babbles about the future Netherlands as a country with a Judeo Christian Islamic tradition, and that she aims to help Islam take root in Dutch society. In saying this, the Minister shows that she has obviously gone stark raving mad. She is betraying Dutch culture and insulting Dutch citizens. Madam Speaker, my party, the Freedom Party, demands that Minister Vogelaar retract her statement. If the Minister fails to do so, the Freedom Party parliamentary group will withdraw its support for her. No Islamic tradition must ever be established in the Netherlands: not now and also not in a few centuries’ time.
Madam Speaker, let me briefly touch on the government’s response to the WRR [Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy] report. On page 12 of its response, the government states that Islam is not contrary to democracy or human rights. All I can say to that is that things can’t get much more idiotic than this.

Madam Speaker, it is a few minutes to twelve. If we go on like this, Islam will herald the end of our Western civilisation as well as Dutch culture.
I would like to round off my first-reading contribution with a personal appeal to the Prime Minister on behalf of a great many Dutch citizens: stop the Islamification of the Netherlands!
Mr Balkenende, a historic task rests on your shoulders. Be courageous. Do what many Dutch citizens are screaming out for. Do what the country needs. Stop all immigration from Muslim countries, ban all building of new mosques, close all Islamic schools, ban burkas and the Koran. Expel all criminal Muslims from the country, including those Moroccan street terrorists that drive people mad. Accept your responsibility! Stop Islamification!
Enough is enough, Mr Balkenende. Enough is enough.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Iranian Gay Rights

So apparently Iran's official policy in dealing with the gay community is to torture and execute them. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who recently was at Columbia University, was welcomed with standing ovations by free-thinking, love-to-debate (unless you're Conservative), future American leaders, also known as college students. Everyone knows how Mahmoud and his clan feel about the gay community: kill them all and let Allah figure it out. How confusing it must be to be a liberal these days. On one hand, you have to plant big, wet, sloppy kisses on the butt of one of the world's most dangerous, psychotic leaders and yet not offend the gay and lesbian groups who Mahmoud, if given the chance, would wipe off the face of the earth. I guess liberals will sleep with anyone, no matter how ironic or hypocritical it is. It's not unlike the on-going farce with the Hugo Chavez Fan Club where you have a steady stream of idiotic celebrities running down to Venezuela to hang with Hugo. No one has figured out what the point is except to maybe thumb one's nose at Washington, as if anyone really cares what Sean Penn or Danny Glover do in their spare time. Liberals, who continuously preach eternal tolerance, now are trying to embrace some of the most intolerant, murderous, hate-filled cultures in history. The fact is that Ahmadinejad is a nutcase who needs to meet up with the same fate as Saddam Hussein. When some Columbia student questioned him on his stance regarding Homosexuality, Mahmoud replied that there are no homosexuals in Iran. He's probably right. They are all lying peacefully in shallow graves out in the desert.

Saturday, November 10, 2007


How can it be that another presidential election is just a year away? And 2008 is shaping up to be the bleakest yet. The MSM has for all intents and purposes already put Hillary in the Oval Office. They breathlessly await the Second Coming of the Clintons. Hillary Rodham Clinton. A junior Senator from New York who has accomplished next to nothing in her political career. Hillary, with her long history of scandals, lies, and radical ideas is the best the Democrats have to offer America. I mean, seriously, what voter with a functioning brain would look at this woman and say, yes, there's a leader, someone with integrity, brilliance, a proven track record, charisma, the highest ethical standards, fresh ideas, a strong wife and mother? Right, that's Hillary. How can it be that we have gotten to this point where someone like Hillary has a real shot at being our next president? I can see it now; Hillary will have the master bedroom while Bubba will take the guest bedroom along with all the interns and cigars he can handle. The White House will finally have its very own Rape Room. Meanwhile, Hillary is up in the Oval Office, unleashing her brand of socialism on the country while millions of liberals everywhere will greedily swallow it all with great big dumb smiles on their faces.

I suppose a certain segment of the voters will vote for Hillary because she has ovaries versus testicles, presumably. I have never quite understood the whole gender obsession thing and why that makes one a better, or worse, president. I actually think a female president would be a good thing as long as she is intelligent and has values that are in step with most of America. That leaves Hillary out for sure. I recently accepted the sad truth that America will never be rid of the Clintons. This "couple" is about one thing: power. This has been their agenda for decades and with the lap dogs in the media, we are in for years of enduring their stench in the political landscape.

To be sure, the issues facing our great nation are numerous and serious: Iraq, Iran, national security, islamic terror, immigration, a slowing economy, health care, I don't know why anyone even wants the job anymore. And, the Bush Administration and Congress are both enjoying historically low approval ratings. Middle America is fed-up. We want and need change. Is the current crop of candidates from either side of the fence going to really implement change? Hardly. But to look at Hillary and say that she's the answer is a brand of insanity I can't even fathom. While I don't think Hillary is the Antichrist, she's not that smart, she is dangerous. If she gets control of our country all I can say is: God, help us all.

One final note on an unrelated topic. Flyover will now have a number of different authors for the simple reason that Scud is too busy globe trotting, making obscene amounts of money, and enjoying the American Dream. Something, unfortunately, liberals cannot understand, or accomplish. Rest assured, we all share the same disdain for the Left and the mindless drones who suckle on the Liberal Teat, pretending to be "progressive" when in fact they are simply morons who subscribe to pop-cultured, secular nonsense. So, buckle-up, Lib Dem Garbage, and enjoy the ride.

Friday, April 13, 2007

When Hypocrites Feed

It was interesting this week to watch the left feed on one of their own. Don Imus, was thrown to the dogs, or in this case, to Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who feasted on him for their own self-gratification - as usual. His offense? Saying something stupid. That mistake was then allowed to escalate into an all out feeding frenzy in which Imus was sent into early retirement and the hypocrisy of the left was fully exposed through the illumination of the media spotlight. I think if everyone is honest here, takes a deep breath and pauses for a moment before joining the hysteria, we should be able to boil this whole thing down to the simple fact that this event is nothing more than an arrogant, washed up radio host trying to be "hip" and funny by saying something reminiscent of the pop culture that so many imbeciles seem to relate to. Imus is not a very funny guy. I rarely listened to his show, and when I did, was nauseated by the smugness of both him and his guests. He was trying to sound controversial and cool and he blew it. End of story. However, in the ridiculous 24 hour news world we live in, this story grew into a full circus with none other than the two biggest race-baiting, poverty pimps in the country, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, as ring leaders, taking over the story and exploiting it for their own selfish purposes. Imus made a huge mistake by groveling in front of Sharpton and asking for forgiveness. He should have known that these men don't advance themselves by resolution, only conflict. Does anybody know why and who considers these men as "black leaders"? Who is stupid enough to follow them? They do nothing for anyone else but themselves, but yet are allowed to claim to be helping others. They are pathetic.

The other amazing hypocrisy brought out through this fiasco is the double standard of the networks that fired Imus. MSNBC and CBS cancelled Imus' radio and TV programs before he had even finished apologizing to everyone. The sad truth is that both networks are responsible for tons of overtly obscene and offensive material put on the public air everyday. For Les Moonves to stand on his solid gold pedestal and feign shock over Imus' statements, while at the same time on another of his networks black women are referred to and shown as nothing more than red meat to be consumed and discarded by unthinking males with their hats on sideways and their pants down to their knees, is disgusting. But that's OK I guess if you're a liberal hypocrite. Pick a target and destroy it without applying similar standards to yourself.

The situation is pretty stupid all the way around; a bad radio guy says something dumb and the left goes nuts. The real fear is now that they've sacrificed one of their own on the alter of political correctness, will they set their sights on others with whom they disagree? My guess is yes. The left would like nothing better than to re-institute the fairness doctrine and silence the voices on radio and television that don't meet the high moral standards of tweetle dee and tweetle dumb - Jackson and Sharpton. Remember, to the left, one of the sacred rights of life is to not be offended. Free speech? Sure, as long as it meets with the approval of idiots like Jackson, Sharpton or any other of the leftist thought police.

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Message for Nancy

Sorry I've been gone for a while. I'm sure you've missed me. Working hard, paying butt loads of taxes to be redistributed to those less industrious, keeps me too busy these days. But, I guess it's the fair thing to do, right lefties? I mean, why should I keep the money I've created by working 70 hours a week, when there's millions of demoncratic constituents out there solidly planted on their fat butts, hungrily nursing at the public teat? I guess if I were raised to be an idiotic piece of scum, I'd do the same thing, and then just vote for the commies in the DFL to get me more. It's only fair.

Anyway, I thought I'd pass on an email that I was somehow blind copied on. As you can see, it's to our esteemed Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, D-California from her friend, Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda terrorist.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Gore Comedy Wins

gorebull warming
Al "the ever expanding blimp" Gore brought the audience at the Oscars and the other billion people watching, to their collective knees in hysterical laughter Sunday night. In his acceptance speech for his Oscar for best comedy, Al "the blimp" Gore giggled with glee as he recalled the many late nights spent making up crap for his movie. The crowd roared with laughter as he explained how in reality, CO2 and most of the other supposed "greenhouse gasses" that are going to destroy the earth any minute, occur naturally and that he had no clue what he was talking about. Between his own bursts of laughter, he managed to state that there was no positive correlation between the increase in CO2 and the slight warming trend over the past 100 years and that most of the statistical rise in average temperature during the last century was due to the warm period in the 30's - long before major industrial development. Melissa Etheridge, singer and boot-wearing bulldyke, practically fell off her chair laughing as Gore revealed that the science is inconclusive and that solar activity is the probable cause of climate change over the past 20,000 years. As the music played, signaling that Gore's fleeting minutes of fame were up, Gore skipped off the stage to raucous laughter and applause. In his brilliant comedic mind, Gore was already planning a sequel to his first comedy. Maybe he'd tell his life story and call it, "Gore, an inconvenient piece of crap". "Yeah", he thought, "just like the dog excrement that inconveniently ends up on the bottom of your shoe; that's just like me!"

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Simple Math

simple math
The Republicans in Congress have failed another simple math test. This past week 17 Republican House members and 7 Republican Senators crossed over into the land of insanity and voted to symbolically spank the President. Essentially, they went to the other side of the field and cheered for the other team - that team being Islamo-fascists. The Dems have been encouraging the enemy for years, but now there are a significant amount of spineless Republicans, worried about their seats, that are willing to join them. Because of the Republicans failure to understand what's at stake, their inability to lead and the reasons for their recent loss, it's time to flunk them and look for another class. We all correctly assume that the treasonous, hate-filled Demoncrats are chomping at the bit to hurt our country by losing in Iraq, putting their heads in the sand and turning the country into another failed euro-style, socialist utopia, but to see the Republicans willingly get into bed with the sociopaths is breathtakingly disappointing. After losing power in November, I had hoped that Republicans would have learned their lesson as to why they lost, but of course, being the out of touch career politicians that they are, they misread the election and chose to believe the lefty media and have now turned on their own caucus and run like the yellow cowards that they obviously are. As far as I'm concerned, they can keep running all the way home. We need to purge congress of these morons and elect true conservatives that care more for the country than they do for their cushy office seats. I have proudly given my hard earned cash to Republican causes in the past, but that has ended for now. The current crop of leadership (if you can call it that) is doing nothing except waving white flags as they run to the left. I hate to admit it but this group is as Julia Roberts said, " found between Reptile and Repugnant". And Julia Roberts is an idiot!

Look, as I said, Demoncrats hate everything about this country. We know that. Oh sure, they claim to be patriotic by standing next to the flag and repeating the same mantra such as, "we support the troops", and "we love America, we just want to make it better", etc. But actions speak louder than words. It is so disappointing to hear republicans spouting the same bile as the enemy within. Our country is in peril. We are at war with an enemy that values death more than life. The Dems don't care. The rest of us do. We need representation in Washington that understands the reality of the world we live in, not spineless career politicians that only think about their overly generous pensions and their Washington perks.

Would someone please flush, and then run the fan for a while because it stinks in Washington right now!

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Run Al, Run!

I think it is our civic duty as patriotic Americans to contact Al Gore and insist that he run for president. Since he will undoubtedly take home an Oscar for his "documentary", "A Convenient Myth", he should definitely parlay that glorious moment into his bid for the presidency, which was so wrongfully denied him in 2000. Unfortunately for Al, the evil cabal of conservatives on the Supreme Court and George Bush and his powerful oil industry friends stole the election away from the deserving Al Gore. Just think of how the election of Al Gore in 2000 could have changed everything. What a different world we would be in today.

First of all, Gore would have hopped on a glider (no green house gas emissions from those pesky jet engines), and gone over to Kyoto and signed the treaty. This, of course would have sent the US economy into a tailspin, virtually shutting down industry, causing huge job loss throughout the country and instantly relegating America as a second tier, former superpower, but hey, so what! Global warming would be all but gone and would no longer be the most threatening cataclysm facing the world since the Disco assault of the late 70's.

Next, Gore would probably have been able to stop the terrorist attacks of 9-11 by engaging in dialog with Bin laden and Al Qaeda and come to a mutually beneficial resolution. Maybe Gore could have negotiated an acceptable number of Jews and Christians to be slaughtered and sacrificed for the sake of the greater peace and the advancement of Islam. Also, maybe he could have convinced them to start using "earth friendly" bombs that don't have the same environmental impact as conventional explosives. But, if not, and the attacks happened anyway, I'm sure he would have responded with a number of presidential proclamations making Islamic sensitivity training mandatory, and would have established cultural awareness centers celebrating the life and teachings of the prophet Mohammed. There would be no war, the earth would be ecologically in perfect balance and peace and understanding would be the global norm. Oh please give us Al Gore! The world needs this man!

But the most appealing facet of a Gore presidential run would be the dirt he could sling Hillary's way. It would no doubt be the most entertaining campaign in our history. Just imagine a Demoncratic primary debate with Hillary, Gore, Edwards, Obama and the ever present and annoying Dennis Kucinich. This would be the funniest freak show ever seen!

Moderator: "Mr. Gore, Why do you think you would be a better president than your fellow candidates?"

Al Gore: "Well, I will save the environment, turn America into the socialist utopia that I've always imagined and make sure that George Bush and all conservatives go to re-education camps until they see the light of the secular progressive movement. Also, I've seen the real Hillary. Satan in a pantsuit! How can you trust a political whore who talks about integrity and the empowerment of women from one side of her mouth, but from the other, protects her political partner from the consequences of doing interns, campaign staff, friends wives and anyone else within arms reach? She's even more of a joke than I am!"

You know that he couldn't resist the opportunity for a little payback against "Hillbilly". In all reality, Gore probably would have been president in 2000 had Clinton had any class and dignity at all and done the right thing and resigned, making Gore a sitting president. But as we all know, the words Clintons and class are never found in the same sentence.

So run Al, run. At this point, the country needs a laugh, and you're it!

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

What Should Be Said.

President Scud
My fellow Americans, Tonight we find ourselves at the precipice of a new age in our country's history. For the past several decades a radical, dark and evil ideology has festered and grown across the globe with an ultimate goal of world domination and forced subservience to their twisted thinking. This cancer of humanity under the banner of Islam has attacked and killed innocent people throughout the world seeking only to indiscriminately destroy, injure and generate fear among civilized populations on every continent. The danger is that this medieval ideology now has the benefit of modern technology and they will use it whenever possible to inflict maximum damage. For years the world has treated terrorism as a series of isolated criminal acts and sought to find and prosecute the perpetrators from a law enforcement mentality. On September 11th, 2001, that changed. We no longer had the luxury of watching these acts of terror happen on distant shores. And so, as President, to protect our nation, I made the decision to respond to this evil with military force. Now 4 years after our initial military intervention in both Afghanistan and Iraq, we along with our allies, have liberated 31 million people in Afghanistan and 26 million people in Iraq. The repressive and evil regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein are gone. Today, in both Iraq and Afghanistan, a democratically elected government is in place and functioning for the benefit of their respective citizens.

At this time, I think it's important to try to clear something up right now. Contrary to the popular belief of some delusional members of the Demoncratic party, and some kooky fringe elements of the extreme left, the events of September 11th were not orchestrated by the American Government! To continue, neither Dick Cheney, myself, or our "friends in the oil business", initiated a war in order to enrich ourselves! Anyone who is crazy enough to think that needs to re-evaluate their citizenship. I hear France is nice. Also, while it's true we went into Iraq initially because we feared there were stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, that wasn't a story made up to justify a war. Every intelligence organization in the world said the same thing. The United Nations voted to take action because of the numerous violations of UN sanctions, and the congress, acting on the same intel we all had, authorized military force in Iraq. Even the Clinton administration called for regime change in Iraq. The bottom line is that in a post 9-11 world, wait and see, was not an option.

Having said this, I am now authorizing and calling for a temporary build up of troops in Iraq with the explicit goal of using whatever force is necessary to purge the country of insurgent terrorists and enable the Iraqi government to take charge and control their country. For too long now, we have been trying to conduct a politically correct war, seeking to get positive coverage on the alphabet channel news coverage and in the world press. It's obvious that will never happen. The only option is to win, and win quickly. This can and will be done with overwhelming force. The military comanders on the ground, in theater, will have every military option open to them to secure our people and our victory. There will be casualties. There always are. But like in other world wars, sacrifice is necessary for the greater good. We have the military skill, equipment and professionalism to accomplish this mission and in doing so, will put the Islamo-fascists on the run. We will continue to hunt them down in whatever corner of the world they seek to hide. We will be relentless and will be victorious.

The opponents of this war wish to run from the fight. They think that if we retreat, and put our heads in the sand, the threat will go away. They couldn't be more wrong. We have learned from history, that appeasement never works. This enemy, even more than those we've faced before, are more dangerous than any the civilized world has ever faced. To them death is better than life and is to be celebrated. The more death and pain they can inflict on innocents, the better. They cannot be reasoned with, only eliminated.

The precipice we stand on now, my fellow Americans, is this; are we to cut and run from the fight that has been brought to us, and hope for the best? Or, do we face the greatest challenge of our age and take the fight to the enemy and seek to preserve our great country? I choose to fight now, and leave a safer world for our children.

God's speed to the brave men and women in our military, and God bless America.

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Freak Show Begins!

Circus Freaks
The 2-year circus began today as the new members of congress were sworn in. It was indeed a proud day for Minnesotans as Keith Ellis found a way to solidify his name in history for being the most insignificant and unqualified congressman to ever get his name in the news for spitting on his country. Ellis is a follower of the cult of death and found it necessary to make a statement during the swearing-in ceremony for new congressional members by swearing in over a Quran instead of the Bible. Yes, over the past 230 years, other texts have been used in the ceremony a couple of times, but never a text that represents an ideology with which the free world is currently at war. Representative Ellis knows this of course, but certain to be a failure; he knew that this was his only chance to gain notoriety. New Speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi was only too excited to oblige the fool from Minnesota in his wish desecrate the event. She too displayed her foolishness and loathsome condescension toward Americans by pretending to have been a suffragette, who only through her persistence and heroism was finally able to break the Marble ceiling and change the course of history for all women everywhere. Come on! Give us a break! She was born into privilege, raised and married into more money, is worth over 25 million dollars, and she expects us to feel proud of her long suffering struggle to achieve power? Sorry Nancy. You're an out of touch San Francisco far lefty that has nothing in common with 98% of this country. And she's 3rd in line to the presidency. This country needs prayer. It will be an entertaining 2 years!