Thursday, December 20, 2007

Democrats - "Where's The Beef?"

It has become pathetically apparent that the Democratic Party - a once great party - is a mere shadow of its former self. It is now a party without substance, leadership, direction or talent. The political Party that produced Jefferson, Cleveland, Truman and JFK, has in recent years, since the 60's, degraded itself to the point where the leadership offered up as their best talent consists of Nancy Pelosi as House leader, Harry Reid as Senate majority leader, and wannabe presidents, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards. Then throw in the other Democrat heavyweights (no pun intended) like Ted Kennedy, John Murtha, Dick Durbin, Barney Frank, etc, and you see a coalition of sub-standard bureaucrats with an agenda that is beholden to special interest groups who basically are aligned with Soviet style communism. Their agenda seeks to offer government solutions to individual problems. Unfortunately, they never tell you that to do this, individual freedoms are sacrificed on the alter of false equity. They govern on the principals of over taxation, regulation and an ideology that crushes economic opportunity, advancement and reward while claiming to be a friend to the meek and powerless. This of course is the big lie that they've been able to project with the willing assistance of their volunteer PR firm, The Mainstream media consisting of 95% of Hollywood, most of television and the vast majority of printed journalism. Add into this propaganda campaign team the all out leftist ideological indoctrination inflicted on college students by the out of touch pseudo-intellectuals that dominate educational faculties throughout the country and its a wonder that we still exist as a nation at all.

Again, just look at the embarrassing crop of presidential candidates offered up by the Democrats since Johnson. Carter and Clinton were able to win because of incredible bungling by conservatives; namely, The Nixon scandals that continued to scar the Ford administration and Ross Perrot who split the conservative vote allowing Clinton to win by default. Other than those 2 recent fluke wins, The Dems have nothing to offer this country in the area of leadership.

Worst of all, this next year, they will offer voters one candidate from the absolute worst crop of potential presidential candidates that this country has ever seen. In an effort to bolster the electability of the 2 leading candidates, Clinton and Obama, strategists have effectively cloned both candidates with popular cultural icons in an attempt to make both the frontrunners more electable to the ignorant, unwashed masses. Obama has been joined at the hip by TV heavyweight, Oprah Winfree. Naturally, the candidate’s new name should be Obamprah. Obampra's primary rival Hillary Clinton is being rescued by her on paper husband and former impeached president, Bill Clinton. It follows therefore that Hillary's new name should be Hillbilly. After all, In 1992 Hillary proudly claimed that the Clinton presidency would be a "co-presidency", a 2 for 1. Both Democratic frontrunners are embarrassing in that neither has the experience or skills appropriate to be leader of the free world. Hillbilly has been a one and a half term senator where she sandbagged her New York election riding the coat tails of her husband who humiliated her in front of the world. But I guess when your entire life is dominated by the desire to attain and retain power, who cares what you have to do to get it. Obama on the other hand is a real featherweight and devastatingly unprepared for a global stage. He basically ran for the senate unopposed and has been there for 2 years - not enough time to develop the type of leadership necessary to lead 300 million people in a dangerous world. His ideas on foreign policy are scary and immature and naturally, his far left ideology demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of free market economies. Then close behind these two giants is the ambulance chasing metro sexual, John Edwards who is trying to buy the presidency with the hundreds of millions of dollars collected by suing corporations for the suffering of innocent accident and illness victims. Like a typical Democrat, Edwards cried to the jury that he was just looking out for the little guy, when actually he was the big winner in the litigation lottery.

So ultimately, with the horrible crop of candidates that the Dems have to choose from, the only true question to be asked is, Who will they choose to lose to whatever Republican they run against? It truly will be the Republican's race to lose. Both Hillbilly and Obamprah are so weak as candidates that it would take a complete collapse on the part of Republicans for them to win. And that will not happen. No matter what propping up is done by the MSM, how many favorable stories and endorsements by fruitcake celebrities, I trust the judgment of real Americans to see through the BS and choose the responsible adult to lead us in 2008. That leader will not be a Democrat!

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Terrorist's rights!

Oh my. The injustice of it all. News flash: Al Qaeda operative Abu Zubayda was waterboarded by the CIA. Watch out, here come the legions of screaming liberals. How dare any U.S government agency resort to these methods in order to extract information from those that will stop at nothing to destroy us. Despite the invaluable information obtained from this cockroach that directly saved lives, liberals everywhere begin to hyperventilate any time they perceive that the inalienable rights of these goat-humping, child-molesting, women-mutilating, murderous, 6th-century, islamic psychopaths are violated.

What is it with liberals? They celebrate 1.5 million murdered children in America annually under the guise of reproductive rights but, apply a little pain to the most inhuman monsters on earth and you'd think Bush was being elected for a third term. It's insane. If the military, CIA, FBI, whomever, has to pull out a few fingernails to keep us from enduring another 9/11, so be it. It's reminiscent of Abu Ghraib, liberals still believe we should be housing captured terrorists at the Waldorf Astoria, including marble foot baths and all the muslim treats we can shove down their bearded, unkempt faces.

Maybe we should put one liberal with each terrorist captured, housed together in the same cell. That way, liberals could monitor the treatment of their precious muslim friends and, at the same time, we'd be dealing out the worst torture ever devised: enduring endless hours in a closed space with a rabid liberal. Nothing could be more horrific than that. Said terrorists would spill their collective guts in no time.

Friday, December 07, 2007

islam's Top Ten

As liberals fight any attempt at profiling middle eastern men, applauding the installation of foot baths at U.S airports for muslims (at U.S. taxpayers expense), and ceaselessly work for the removal of the Ten Commandments in any public building along with any reference to the Holy Bible or Jesus Christ in American society, here’s a top ten list describing the wonderful attributes of islam, the religion of peace.

#1 10,000 deadly terror attacks committed explicitly in the name of islam in just the last six years. (Other religions combined for perhaps a dozen or so).

#2 Muhammad, the prophet of islam, had people killed for insulting him or criticizing his religion. This included women. Muslims are told to emulate the example of Muhammad.

#3 Muhammad said in many places that he has been "ordered by Allah to fight men until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger." In the last nine years of his life, he ordered no less than 65 military campaigns to do exactly that.
Muhammad inspired his men to war with the basest of motives, using captured loot, sex and a gluttonous paradise as incentives. He beheaded captives, enslaved children and raped women captured in battle. Again, Muslims are told to emulate the example of Muhammad.

#4 After Muhammad died, the people who lived with him, and knew his religion best, immediately fell into war with each other.
Muhammad's favorite daughter, Fatima, and her husband, Ali (the second convert to islam, who was raised like a son to Muhammad) fought a war against an army raised by Aisha, Muhammad's favorite wife - and one whom he had said was the "perfect woman."
Not only was her husband, Ali, eventually murdered, but Fatima (who survived the early years at Mecca safe and sound) died of stress from the persecution of fellow Muslims only three months after her father died.
Three of the first four Muslim rulers (caliphs) were murdered. All of them were among Muhammad's closest companions. The third caliph was killed by the son of the first. The fourth caliph was killed by the fifth, who subsequently poisoned one of Muhammad's two favorite grandsons. Muhammad's other grandson was later beheaded by the sixth caliph.
Within 50 years, the Kaaba, which had stood for centuries under pagan religion, lay in ruins from internal Muslim war.

#5 Muhammad directed Muslims to wage war on other religions and bring them under submission to islam. Within the first few decades following his death, his Arabian companions invaded and conquered Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist and Zoroastrian lands.

#6 Muslims continued their Jihad against other religions for 1400 years, checked only by the ability of non-Muslims to defend themselves. To this day, not a week goes by that islamic fundamentalists do not attempt to kill Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists explicitly in the name of Allah.
None of these other religions are at war with each other.

#7 islam is the only religion that has to retain its membership by threatening to kill anyone who leaves. This is according to the example set by Muhammad.

#8 islam teaches that non-Muslims are less than fully human. Muhammad said that Muslims can be put to death for murder, but that a Muslim could never be put to death for killing a non-Muslim.

#9 The Qur'an never once speaks of Allah's love for non-Muslims, but it speaks of Allah's cruelty toward and hatred of non-Muslims more than 500 times.

#10 "Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar!"
(The last words from the cockpit of Flight 93) Home Page

Monday, December 03, 2007

islam: the religion of peace

Here's an excellent speech delivered by Geert Wilders to the Dutch Parliament earlier this Fall. This guy gets it, unlike so many political and liberal idiots in this country who bend over backwards to cater to islam. Islam is a 6th century death cult that is completely incompatible with Western Civilization, values, and beliefs. When Nancy Pelosi swore in MN Congressman Keith Ellison on a qur'an versus a Bible the resultant uproar by Americans was met with a flood of screaming from liberals, who think it's perfectly acceptable to recognize this Murder Manual as the wonderful document that it is. No matter that our enemies stand on it and use it to justify killing us infidels. Read on.

Madam Speaker, allow me, first, to express my sincere thanks to you personally for having planned a debate on Islam on the very day of my birthday. I could not have wished for a nicer present!
Madam Speaker, approximately 1400 years ago war was declared on us by an ideology of hate and violence which arose at the time and was proclaimed by a barbarian who called himself the Prophet Mohammed. I am referring to Islam.

Madam Speaker, let me start with the foundation of the Islamic faith, the Koran. The Koran’s core theme is about the duty of all Muslims to fight non-Muslims; an Islamic Mein Kampf, in which fight means war, jihad. The Koran is above all a book of war – a call to butcher non-Muslims (2:191, 3:141, 4:91, 5:3), to roast them (4:56, 69:30-69:32), and to cause bloodbaths amongst them (47:4). Jews are compared to monkeys and pigs (2:65, 5:60, 7:166), while people who believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God must according to the Koran be fought (9:30).

Madam Speaker, the West has no problems with Jews or Christians, but it does have problems with Islam. It is still possible, even today, for Muslims to view the Koran, which they regard as valid for all time, as a license to kill. And that is exactly what happens. The Koran is worded in such a way that its instructions are addressed to Muslims for eternity, which includes today’s Muslims. This in contrast to texts in the Bible, which is formulated as a number of historical narratives, placing events in a distant past. Let us remind ourselves that it was Muslims, not Jews or Christians, who committed the catastrophic terrorist attacks in New York, Madrid and London; and that it was no coincidence that Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered by a Muslim, Mohammed Bouyeri.

Madam Speaker, I acknowledge that there are people who call themselves Muslims and who respect our laws. My party, the Freedom Party, has nothing against such people, of course. However, the Koran does have something against them. For it is stated in the Koran in Sura 2, verse 85, that those believers who do not believe in everything the Koran states will be humiliated and receive the severest punishment; which means that they will roast in Hell. In other words, people who call themselves Muslims but who do not believe, for example, in Sura 9, verse 30, which states that Jews and Christians must be fought, or, for example, in Sura 5, verse 38, which states that the hand of a thief must be cut off, such people will be humiliated and roast in Hell. Note that it is not me who is making this up. All this can be found in the Koran. The Koran also states that Muslims who believe in only part of the Koran are in fact apostates, and we know what has to happen to apostates. They have to be killed.

Madam Speaker, the Koran is a book that incites to violence. I remind the House that the distribution of such texts is unlawful according to Article 132 of our Penal Code. In addition, the Koran incites to hatred and calls for murder and mayhem. The distribution of such texts is made punishable by Article 137(e). The Koran is therefore a highly dangerous book; a book which is completely against our legal order and our democratic institutions. In this light, it is an absolute necessity that the Koran be banned for the defence and reinforcement of our civilisation and our constitutional state. I shall propose a second-reading motion to that effect.

Madam Speaker, there is no such thing as “moderate Islam”. As Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said the other day, and I quote, “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it”. Islam is in pursuit of dominance. It wishes to exact its imperialist agenda by force on a worldwide scale (8:39). This is clear from European history. Fortunately, the first Islamic invasion of Europe was stopped at Poitiers in 732; the second in Vienna in 1683. Madam Speaker, let us ensure that the third Islamic invasion, which is currently in full spate, will be stopped too in spite of its insidious nature and notwithstanding the fact that, in contrast to the 8th and 17th centuries, it has no need for an Islamic army because the scared “dhimmis” in the West, also those in Dutch politics, have left their doors wide open to Islam and Muslims.
Apart from conquest, Madam Speaker, Islam is also bent on installing a totally different form of law and order, namely Sharia law. This makes Islam, apart from a religion for hundreds of millions of Muslims also, and in particular, a political ideology (with political/constitutional/Islamic basic values, etc). Islam is an ideology without any respect for others; not for Christians, not for Jews, not for non believers and not for apostates. Islam aims to dominate, subject, kill and wage war.

Madam Speaker, the Islamic incursion must be stopped. Islam is the Trojan Horse in Europe. If we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia and Netherabia will just be a matter of time. One century ago, there were approximately 50 Muslims in the Netherlands. Today, there are about 1 million Muslims in this country. Where will it end? We are heading for the end of European and Dutch civilisation as we know it. Where is our Prime Minister in all this? In reply to my questions in the House he said, without batting an eyelid, that there is no question of our country being Islamified. Now, this reply constituted a historical error as soon as it was uttered. Very many Dutch citizens, Madam Speaker, experience the presence of Islam around them. And I can report that they have had enough of burkas, headscarves, the ritual slaughter of animals, so called honour revenge, blaring minarets, female circumcision, hymen restoration operations, abuse of homosexuals, Turkish and Arabic on the buses and trains as well as on town hall leaflets, halal meat at grocery shops and department stores, Sharia exams, the Finance Minister’s Sharia mortgages, and the enormous overrepresentation of Muslims in the area of crime, including Moroccan street terrorists.
In spite of all this, Madam Speaker, there is hope. Fortunately. The majority of Dutch citizens have become fully aware of the danger, and regard Islam as a threat to our culture. My party, the Freedom Party, takes those citizens seriously and comes to their defense.
Many Dutch citizens are fed up to the back teeth and yearn for action. However, their representatives in The Hague are doing precisely nothing. They are held back by fear, political correctness or simply electoral motives. This is particularly clear in the case of PvdA, the Dutch Labour Party, which is afraid of losing Muslim voters. The Prime Minister said in Indonesia the other day that Islam does not pose any danger. Minister Donner believes that Sharia law should be capable of being introduced in the Netherlands if the majority want it. Minister Vogelaar babbles about the future Netherlands as a country with a Judeo Christian Islamic tradition, and that she aims to help Islam take root in Dutch society. In saying this, the Minister shows that she has obviously gone stark raving mad. She is betraying Dutch culture and insulting Dutch citizens. Madam Speaker, my party, the Freedom Party, demands that Minister Vogelaar retract her statement. If the Minister fails to do so, the Freedom Party parliamentary group will withdraw its support for her. No Islamic tradition must ever be established in the Netherlands: not now and also not in a few centuries’ time.
Madam Speaker, let me briefly touch on the government’s response to the WRR [Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy] report. On page 12 of its response, the government states that Islam is not contrary to democracy or human rights. All I can say to that is that things can’t get much more idiotic than this.

Madam Speaker, it is a few minutes to twelve. If we go on like this, Islam will herald the end of our Western civilisation as well as Dutch culture.
I would like to round off my first-reading contribution with a personal appeal to the Prime Minister on behalf of a great many Dutch citizens: stop the Islamification of the Netherlands!
Mr Balkenende, a historic task rests on your shoulders. Be courageous. Do what many Dutch citizens are screaming out for. Do what the country needs. Stop all immigration from Muslim countries, ban all building of new mosques, close all Islamic schools, ban burkas and the Koran. Expel all criminal Muslims from the country, including those Moroccan street terrorists that drive people mad. Accept your responsibility! Stop Islamification!
Enough is enough, Mr Balkenende. Enough is enough.